Skip to main content

Mythos Exposes a Bigger Problem in Critical Infrastructure Cyber Defense

Back to All Publications

In early May, the Administration convened the chief executives of Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and SpaceX to discuss the policy response to Anthropic’s Mythos Preview model — a system that autonomously discovered thousands of high- and critical-severity software vulnerabilities, including previously unknown zero-days in production code dating back decades. The administration’s proposed response: a mandatory pre-release vetting regime modeled on the Food and Drug Administration’s pre-market approval process. 

The instinct is understandable. Mythos represents a visible capability threshold crossing — the kind that demands a response. On the Firefox 147 benchmark, Mythos developed working exploits 181 times compared to just two for the previous generation model. That is not an incremental development. It is a threshold crossing, and threshold crossings demand a response. The problem is not the instinct. It is the targeting. The proposed vetting regime is aimed at the wrong chokepoint — and for the critical infrastructure operators I spent four years working to protect at CISA, that mismatch has direct operational consequences. 


View All Publications